Fiore v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
696 F.2d 205 · 1982
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably United States v. Casamento (1989), United States v. Elkin (1984)
45 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 333 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Dotterweich · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · United States v. Park · Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[m]ay be required to make restitution or reparation to aggrieved parties for actual damages or loss caused by the offense for which conviction was had.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the defendant on probation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“defendant may not be required to pay reparations to persons not aggrieved by his crimes, or simply to the community at large.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.