Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 A2D 297 - In Re Cicchetti

In Re Cicchetti’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably In Re Cicchetti (2000), In Re Trkula (1997)

50 state decisions

300199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1)The Board and the Judicial Officer may elect to file written objections which shall include the basis for the objections to the Court’s findings and conclusions. (2) Any objections shall be filed with the Court within 10 days of the entry of the findings and conclusions. A copy of the objections shall be served upon the opposing party. The President Judge may for cause shown extend the time for filing objections. (3) The Court may permit the Judicial Officer and the Board to present oral argument on any objections filed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.