Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 F.3d 225

Docket No. 93-6715.

Kurt Steven Matlock v. S. R. Phillips Anthony B. Deel Richard C. Massey

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: August 20, 1993. Decided: September 22, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-09-22

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Sarrami v. Nouri International Interior Design Incorporated

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-09-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Kurt Steven Matlock, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Kurt Steven Matlock appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Matlock v. Phillips, No. CA-92-658-R (W.D. Va. June 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)

/7/f3d/225 · .json · Public domain