Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 F.3d 225

Docket No. 93-6141.

Mazyck v. Smith

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 12, 1993. Decided: September 29, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-09-29

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2003

1 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Sarrami v. Nouri International Interior Design Incorporated

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-09-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CA-91-3434-N)

Andre Mazyck, Appellant Pro Se.

Tarra R. Minnis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Andre Mazyck appeals from the district court's order dismissing two of his claims and denying relief on the remainder of his petition made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mazyck v. Smith, No. CA-91-3434-N (D. Md. Feb. 5, 1992).

¶2

We grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal but deny Mazyck's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/7/f3d/225 · .json · Public domain