Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 F.3d 228

Docket No. 93-6713.

Jose Vanegas v. David K. Mapp, Norfolk Sheriff's Department

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: August 20, 1993. Decided: September 22, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-09-22

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Gustavo Antonio Urrunaga

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-09-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

Jose Vanegas, Appellant Pro Se.

Conrad Moss Shumadine, John Stephen Wilson, Mark Douglas Stiles, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Jose Vanegas appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vanegas v. Mapp, No. CA-92-337 (E.D. Va. June 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/7/f3d/228 · .json · Public domain