Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Haw. App. 463 - Cordeiro v. Burns

7 Haw. App. 463 - Cordeiro v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2019

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 3 Haw. App. 486 - Costa v. Able Distributors, Inc. · 1 Haw. App. 519 - Jacoby v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital · Wiegand v. Colbert · Flint v. MacKenzie · Haase v. Webster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party opposing the motion for summary judgment must be able to point to some facts which refute the proof of the movant in some material portion and “not merely recite the incantation, ‘Credibility,’ and have a trial on the hope that a jury may disbelieve factually uncontested proof.” The non-moving party must come forward with some evidentiary matters to support its position. By failing to present any specific evidence of discrepancies or contradiction among [the deponent’s] statements, [the nonmoving party] has failed to raise any genuine issue of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.