Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 WASH 33 - Hill v. Young

Hill v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 1998 · most notably Warburton v. White (1900), Kromer v. Friday (1895)

24 state decisions

5018931900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yesler v. Hochstettler · Florence v. . Hopkins · Balch v. Smith · Martin v. Walker · Bollo v. Navarro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rights of the several parties, plaintiffs as well as defendants, may be put in issue, tried and determined in such suit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.