Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

70 F.3d 112

Docket No. 95-7195.

Jeter v. Dixon

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1995. Decided Nov. 15, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on David Medina v. Michelle K. Loveless, and James W. Loveless

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-11-15

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rodney Kemp Jeter, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jeter v. Dixon, No. CA-95-609-5-F (E.D.N.C. July 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/70/f3d/112 · .json · Public domain