70 N.J.L. 823
Decided September 30, 1904
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1904-09-30
<p>It is the settled practice of this court not to consider alleged errors if the printed book furnished the court shows no bill of exceptions signed by the trial judge. Davis v. Littel, 35 Vroom 595, followed.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1952
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1904-09-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The assignments of error are all directed at errors supposed to have been committed in the trial, and which can only be presented for review by bills of exceptions.
¶2The printed book furnished the court shows no bill of ex-tions signed by the trial judge.
¶3Under the settled practice of this court, the alleged errors cannot be considered. Davis v. Littel, 35 Vroom 595.
¶4No error being shown, the judgment must be affirmed.