United States v. Jamil’s Empirical Analysis
707 F.2d 638 · 1983
Citation profile
75 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Cullen v. Margiotta (1987), United States v. Tutino (1989)
75 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2512 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 22 U.S.C. § 2778
Relies on Hamling v. United States · Massiah v. United States · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · Cole v. United States · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“absence of a significant showing of unfair prejudice, evidence with substantial probative value should not be excluded,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“During the course of his representation of a client a lawyer shall not: Communicate or cause another to communicate on the subject of the representation with a party he knows to be represented by a lawyer in that matter unless he has the prior consent of the lawyer representing such other party or is authorized by law to do so.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must look at the evidence in a light most favorable to its proponent, maximizing its probative value and minimizing its prejudicial effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.