Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 So. 2d 329 - Crockett v. Crockett

708 So. 2d 329 - Crockett v. Crockett’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2015

10 state decisions

70199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer · 592 So. 2d 678 - Rahming v. State · Kozacik v. Kozacik · 582 So. 2d 1212 - Akers v. Akers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A joint tenancy may be terminated by any act that destroys one or more of the necessary unities of interest, title, time, and possession, provided the act of the joint tenant who severs his interest is such as to preclude him from claiming any survivorship interest in the subject matter of the joint tenancy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although the wife argues on appeal that the loan was made from her separate account with inherited funds, she did not establish the nonmarital character of the account at trial. The funds lost any arguable separate identity when the wife commingled them with her overtime earnings made during the marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]ll vested and nonvested benefits, rights, and funds accrued during the marriage in retirement, pension, profit-sharing, annuity, deferred compensation, and insurance plans and programs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.