Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 SO3D 1 - Hill v. State

Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Armstrong v. State · 680 So. 2d 980 - Puckett v. State · 462 So. 2d 740 - Mitchell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““THE COURT: I am sorry. I can’t agree with you, that you have done everything, because one of the minimum requirements is telling the Community Corrections officer where you live. I don’t think you have been living where you told him you lived. So sorry. I gave you an opportunity. Good luck, sir.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.