Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 NW2D 200 - Bowman v. State

Bowman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Graves · State v. Hopkins · State v. Wills · State v. Artzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he prejudice prong of the Strickland test “does not mean a defendant must establish ‘that counsel’s deficient conduct more likely than not altered the outcome in the case.’ A defendant need only show that the probability of a different result is ‘sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “questioning of a witness on whether another witness is telling the truth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.