Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 711 SO2D 1240 - State v. Word

State v. Word’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 376 So. 2d 285 - State v. Hankins · 671 So. 2d 228 - Braswell v. State · 481 So. 2d 991 - Sobel v. Goldman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is clear from a plain reading of the language of the statute that by removing the wheels and tires of the automobile, appellee entered the vehicle by taking apart a portion of the conveyance.... Appellee's theft of the wheels and tires removed from the automobile supply sufficient evidence of his intent to commit an offense after entering the automobile by taking apart or removing the wheels and tires. To the extent that State v. Hankins, 376 So.2d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979) can be read to hold to the contrary, we are in conflict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.