State v. Waddoups’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2022
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kelbach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) a final judgment of dismissal, including a dismissal of a felony information following a refusal to bind the defendant over for trial; (b) an order arresting judgment; (c) an order terminating the prosecution because of a finding of double jeopardy or denial of a speedy trial; (d) a judgment of the court holding a statute or any part of it invalid; (e) an order of the court granting a pretrial motion to suppress evidence when upon a petition for review the appellate court decides that the appeal would be in the interest of justice; (f) under circumstances not amounting to a final order under subsection (2)(a), a refusal to bind the defendant over for trial on a felony as charged or a pretrial order dismissing or quashing in part a felony information, when upon a petition for review the appellate court decides that the appeal would be in the interest of justice; or (g)an order of the court granting a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stirba · State v. Larsen“'the State [would have) an appeal of right from virtually every adverse pretrial order, for the State will almost always be able to dismiss a case, appeal from that dismissal, and then refile the charges, whatever the outcome of the appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Houston · State v. Cushing“delineates a narrow category of cases in which the prosecution may take an appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Amador · State v. Harrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.