Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

712 P.2d 223

State v. Waddoups

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1985

Utah Supreme Court · decided 1985-12-09

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“(a) a final judgment of dismissal, including a dismissal of a felony information following a refusal to bind the defendant over for trial; (b) an order arresting judgment; (c) an order terminating the prosecution because of a finding of double jeopardy or denial of a speedy trial; (d) a judgment of the court holding a statute or any part of it invalid; (e) an order of the court granting a pretrial motion to suppress evidence when upon a petition for review the appellate court decides that the appeal would be in the interest of justice; (f) under circumstances not amounting to a final order under subsection (2)(a), a refusal to bind the defendant over for trial on a felony as charged or a pretrial order dismissing or quashing in part a felony information, when upon a petition for review the appellate court decides that the appeal would be in the interest of justice; or (g)an order of the court granting a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including State v. Stirba, State v. Larsen

“'the State [would have) an appeal of right from virtually every adverse pretrial order, for the State will almost always be able to dismiss a case, appeal from that dismissal, and then refile the charges, whatever the outcome of the appeal.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including State v. Houston, State v. Cushing

Relies on State v. Kelbach

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-12-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2022

11 state decisions

5019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DURHAM, Justice:

¶1 This is an appeal from an order of dismissal of a criminal case. The State claims error in a pretrial ruling declaring a witness incompetent to testify and suppressing the witness’s out-of-court statements. No error in the dismissal itself is claimed, since it was granted at the State’s request after the entry of the pretrial order. The *224 threshold question for our determination is whether the State may pursue an appeal of right under these circumstances.

¶2 The circumstances under which the State may appeal adverse rulings in the trial court in criminal cases have traditionally been limited by constitutional and statutory provisions. See, e.g., State v. Kelbach, Utah, 569 P.2d 1100 (1977) (State has no right to appeal except as expressly provided by statute). The Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure have codified that restrictive approach in U.C.A., 1953, § 77-35-26, which delineates a narrow category of cases in which the prosecution may take an appeal. An appeal from an order granting a pretrial motion to suppress is not permitted as a matter of right, but only “when, upon a petition for review, the supreme court decides that such an appeal would be in the interest of justice.” U.C.A., 1953, § 77-35-26(c)(5). The State has attempted to circumvent this Court’s discretion to grant or deny petitions for review pursuant to this section by requesting a dismissal and relying on paragraph (1) of Rule 26(c), which permits an appeal of right by the prosecution “[f]rom a final judgment of dismissal.”

¶3 It is clear from the briefs and oral argument in this case that the State wishes to have this Court review, not the trial court’s order of dismissal, but the earlier order of suppression. To allow an appeal of right in such a circumstance would give the State an appeal of right from virtually every adverse pretrial order. That result would be inconsistent with our law and would be a distortion of the language and intent of the statute. Therefore, we hold that this appeal has not been properly filed, and we order it dismissed.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART, HOWE and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.
/712/p2d/223 · .json · Public domain