Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

714 F.2d 1084

Docket No. 81-7441.

Dasher v. Stripling

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-09-16

2 counsel of record

Relies on Frye v. United States · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1983-09-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2010

19 federal appellate ·

1201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Mary Beth Westmoreland, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.

Joseph B. Bergen and John J. Sullivan, Savannah, Ga., for petitioner.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The state appeals a grant of a writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court. A panel of this Court reversed in a divided decision. Dasher v. Stripling, 685 F.2d 385 (11th Cir.1982). This Court took the case en banc, which resulted in the panel opinion being vacated. The judges of the en banc court are equally divided on the proper disposition of this case. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is affirmed as a matter of law, and this decision of the Court of Appeals has no precedential value. Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District, 584 F.2d 115 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906, 99 S.Ct. 1996, 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).

¶2

AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.

/714/f2d/1084 · .json · Public domain