Ivanov-McPhee v. Washington National Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
719 F.2d 927 · 1983
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors (1993), Yarema v. Exxon Corp. (1986)
42 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co. · In re Massachusetts Helicopter Airlines, Inc. · Ringwald v. Harris · Jones v. Den Norske Amerikalinje A/S
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where consolidated cases could, without undue burden, have been brought as one action, where there is no clear evidence that they have in substance been consolidated only for limited purposes, and where there is no showing that the appellant's interests will be seriously undermined by dismissal of the appeal, the provisions of Rule 54(b) must be complied with, notwithstanding that the judgment in question disposes of all the claims and parties in one of the original actions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“cannot ... discern any purposes of substance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.