72 A.3d 263
Decided July 24, 2013
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2013-07-24
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2015
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Did Superior Court err by suppressing a confession that respondent gave after receiving Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1964), warnings because, six days prior to any police questioning, while in custody in another jurisdiction, he had signed a form antici-patorily declining to be interviewed?”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Bland, D.
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-07-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 24th day of July 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did Superior Court err by suppressing a confession that respondent gave after receiving Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), warnings because, six days prior to any police questioning, while in custo*264dy in another jurisdiction, he had signed a form anticipatorily declining to be interviewed?