Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 Me. 244

Stevens v. Haskell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 23, 1881

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1881-05-23

vOn EXCEPTIONS. (Declaration.) ' In a plea of the case for that whereas the plaintiff, on the (fifteenth day of March, A. D. 1874, was the owner of a certain ■ saw mill situated on Sawadabscook stream, in the town of Hamp- ■ den, of the value of one thousand dollars, and whereas the said Hathorn, then in full life, was in full possession of said mill for the purpose of manufacturing lumber, at a rent of a certain sum per thousand feet, and then and there said Hathorn, by his…

Decided 1881-05-23

Walton, J.

¶1No action against an executor or administrator, on a claim against tbe estate, can be maintained, unless such claim is first presented in writing, as required by tbe act of 1872, c. 85, § 12. Like every other fact essential to tbe maintenance of tbe suit, tbe notice, or presentation in writing, must be first averred in tbe declaration, and then proved at the trial. An averment of this fact is as essential as tbe averment of any other fact necessary to maintain tbe action. A declaration against an executor or an administrator upon such a claim, without such an averment, is defective; and defective, not in form merely, but in substance; for tbe averment is one that must be proved as well as made. It is therefore a defect that may be taken advantage of upon general demurrer. Tbe declaration in'this case is, in this particular, defective. Eaton v. Buswell, 69 Maine, 552.

¶2Exceptions sustained. Eeclaration adjudged bad.

Appleton, C.' J., Danporth, Virgin, Peters and Libbey, JJ., concurred.
/72/me/244 · .json · Public domain