Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 U.S. 822

Seymour v. Freer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1866

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1866-12

Relies on The Peterhoff

Cited in Case Law’s definition of “appeal”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

No disposition · 9–0 · Decided 1866-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1951 · most notably Richards v. United States (1951), O'Reilly v. Edrington (1877)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1201866187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Where, through mistake or accident, no bond, or a'defective bond, has been filed, this court will not dismiss the appeal, — if it is in all other respecta quite regulaf, — except on failure to comply with ati order to give the proper security within such reasonable time as it may prescribe.

¶2Appeal from the Circuit Court for Northern Illinois.

¶3This was a.motion to dismiss an apppal because the bond for the prosecution of the appeal was not filed within ten days after the decree.'

¶4It Rppeared that the decree in the Circuit Court was drawn and placed in the hands of the clerk on the 15th of November, 1866, upon an understanding by.the counsel, sanctioned by the court, that it was to be entered, wheh approved by the court, as of that day. It was retained for several days by the judge, who required a stipulation from counsel in respect to the receiver appointed by the decree, and was then returned to the clerk, and entered on the 20th as of-the 15th. The bond was filed on the 28th.

¶5The CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6delivered the opinion of the court.

¶7We think that for the purposes of appeal this decree must be regarded as having been passed on the 20th, and that the bond was filed in time.

¶8Hut if this were otherwise, and through' mistake or accident no bond, or a defective bond, had been filed, this eourtwould not .dismiss the ap.pea.1, except on failure to comply with an order to give the proper security within such reasonable time as it might prescribe.* What is essential to an *823appeal is allowance, citation to the appellees, or equivalent notice or- waiver, and the bringing up of the record at the next term of this court. Security for prosecution should be taken by the judge on signing the. citation; but if this duty be omitted or defectively performed, a remedy can be applied here on motion.

¶9In the present case a bond, admitted, to be sufficient for costs of prosecution, whether given in time'to'make appeal operate as a supersedeas or not, -was filed in the court below before removal to this court.

¶10The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be

¶11Denied.

/72/us/822 · .json · Public domain