Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 SO2D 395 - State v. Manuel

State v. Manuel’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 391 So. 2d 813 - State v. Devito · 637 So. 2d 1032 - State v. Joseph · State v. Groth · State v. Guillory

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “during the two-year prescriptive period to bring a defendant back to Louisiana for trial when he is incarcerated in another state, (even if extradition is not allowed), that action would arguably constitute an interruption under La.C.Cr.P. art. 579(A)(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.