Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. Homestake Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis
722 F.2d 1407 · 1983
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably United States v. Murphy (1985), Gaf Corporation v. United States Keene Corporation (1987)
46 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 177 · 25 U.S.C. § 180 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (Indian Claims Limitation Act of 1982) · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie · Nevada v. United States · Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity · Underwriters National Assurance Company v. North Carolina Life and Accident and Health Insurance Guaranty Association · United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Dismissal of a suit for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction precludes relitigation of the same issue of subject matter jurisdiction in a second federal suit on the same claim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“assert[ed] identical claims and jurisdictional grounds”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Oglala Sioux’s suggestion that Judge Bogue should have recused himself is both legally insufficient and untimely [and] should have been raised in the trial court. [W]e believe that a timeliness requirement is appropriate, especially in the case where the Oglala Sioux were aware of the alleged grounds for disqualification at the time the case was assigned to Judge Bogue, but the suggestion for disqualification was not raised until this appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.