Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 F.2d 869 - Irizarry v. Quiros

Irizarry v. Quiros’s Empirical Analysis

722 F.2d 869 · 1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
June 2011
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2011

7 federal appellate · 7 district ·

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 29 U.S.C. § 1801 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1855 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 651 (§ 2 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Griffin v. Breckenridge · Smith v. Wade · Maine v. Thiboutot · Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Novotny · Hill v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 25

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The instant facts fall within section 1985(2)'s prohibitions. Plaintiffs have proved that they were denied reemployment because they previously had instituted legal actions to vindicate their federal rights.... If, as must be the fact, the commerce power supports the FLCRA, it must equally justify penalizing those who would restrain its exercise by retaliation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.