Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 NW2D 778 - State v. Ondayog

State v. Ondayog’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Rompilla v. Beard · Ledezma v. State · State v. Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e will not reverse where counsel has made a reasonable decision concerning trial tactics and strategy, even if such judgments ultimately fail.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Courts generally presume counsel is competent and a defendant must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Prejudice exists if there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.