Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

727 A.2d 1113

Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1999

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1999-04-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2018

2 federal appellate ·

Relies on Commonwealth v. Anders

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-04-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 1999, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted limited to the issue of whether the violation of Pa.R.Crim.P.Rule 1405 entities Petitioner to a discharge. Furthermore, the order of the Superior Court as it pertains to the Rule 1405 issue is vacated and this matter is remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing and argument concerning the defendant’s right to relief for untimely sentencing. See Commonwealth v. Anders, — Pa. -, 725 A.2d 170 (1999).

/727/a2d/1113 · .json · Public domain