Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 N.J.L. 679

State v. Murdaca

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 6, 1905

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1905-12-06

<p>On error to the Supreme Court.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1905-12-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1983

3 state decisions

10190519101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1An examination of the assignments of error and the bills of exceptions and the causes filed for reversal, and the entire record before us, discloses no ground for reversal.

¶2The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill. 15.For reversal — None.
/73/njl/679 · .json · Public domain