Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 S.D. 64 - State v. Jerke

State v. Jerke’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2002 · most notably State v. Guthrie (2001), State v. Tuttle (2002)

27 state decisions

901949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pirkey · State v. Kirby · State v. Fulwider · State v. Phelps · State v. Husman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not particularize the claimed deficiency or failure of proof”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The rule seems to be well settled that, when a penal statute mentions several acts disjunctively, and prescribes that each shall constitute the same offense and is subject to the same punishment, an information may charge any and all of such acts conjunctively as constituting a single offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.