Creasy v. Rusk’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural Resources (2001), Kubsch v. State (2003)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (§ 804 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Tommy Olmstead Commissioner Georgia Department of Human Resourcess v. L C Jonathan Zimring · Webb v. Jarvis · 177 Ind. App. 403 - Kroger Co. v. Haun · Fleener v. State · Douglass v. Irvin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[elhildren over the age of 14, absent special circumstances, are chargeable with exercising the standard of care of an adult.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mitchell v. State · Kubsch v. State“In Indiana, the workers’ compensation system, not the tort system, exists to cover such employment-related losses. To the extent that the workers’ compensation system is inadequate as Creasy asserts, the inadequacy reflects defects in the workers’ compensation system and is not a ground for alternative recovery under tort law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gyuriak v. Millice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.