Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 N.E.2d 672 - Noojin v. State

Noojin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

45 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · Morgan v. State · Wright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The issue is not whether in our judgment the sentence is unreasonable, but whether it is clearly, plainly, and obviously so.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hollen v. State · Tobar v. State
  2. “manifestly unreasonable in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Bailey v. State · Hollen v. State
  3. “(tlhe amount of time that has passed between the event and the statement is relevant but not dispostive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Rogers v. State · Hammon v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.