Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 P2D 905 - Hope v. State

Hope v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2006

10 state decisions

70198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glass v. State · Freeman v. State · Vowell v. State · Sands v. State · Meggett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the privilege to remove a spectator from the courtroom is clearly within the sound discretion of the trial judge”); Clegg v. State, 655 P.2d 1240, 1243 (Wyo.1982) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.