Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 NW2D 141 - State v. Maurstad

State v. Maurstad’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably State v. Washington (2018), State v. Rick (2013)

1 district · 36 state decisions

270200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Muscarello v. United States · State v. Ramey · State v. Shattuck · State v. Misquadace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because a sentence based on an incorrect criminal history score is an illegal sentence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to effectuate the ... policy [of the Guidelines], sentences must be based on correct criminal history scores ... [that] ensure that defendants with similar criminal histories receive approximately equal sanctions for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.