Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F.2d 867 - United States v. Tzakis

United States v. Tzakis’s Empirical Analysis

736 F.2d 867 · 1984

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably United States v. Chaney (1992), United States v. Cauwenberghe (1987)

26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

1901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 4244 · 28 U.S.C. § 1918

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Rideout v. United States · Bearden v. Georgia · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Dix v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n the absence of any further factual developments”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.