Gilmore v. Hodges’s Empirical Analysis
738 F.3d 266 · 2013
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Pearson v. Callahan · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Hope v. Pelzer · Brosseau v. Haugen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e look only to binding precedent-holdings of cases drawn from the United States Supreme Court, this Court, or the highest court of the state where the events took place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“courts should ascertain the validity of a qualified immunity defense as early in the lawsuit as possible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Howard v. Wilkinson“only binding precedent can clearly establish a right for qualified immunity purposes,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Corbitt v. Vickers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.