United States v. Carbone’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.2d 45 · 1984
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably United States v. Casamento (1989), United States v. Read (1985)
49 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Commissioner v. Engle · Mabry v. Johnson · Mabry v. Johnson · United States v. Arnett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Despite the fact that the prosecutor alone breached the plea agreement, 'compliance with the agreement is best insured by requiring resentencing before another district judge.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Although a defendant has no constitutional right to have an executory plea agreement specifically enforced, Mabry v. Johnson, ... once a plea actually is entered, and was induced by a prosecutor's promise to abstain from making a sentencing recommendation, that promise must be fulfilled." (Citation omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]t sentencing proceedings^] discussion subsequent to an initial ruling may result in the court’s modifying its initial pronouncement, all before its ruling becomes ‘final.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.