74 N.J.L. 598
Decided February 2, 1907
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1907-02-02
<p>On error to the Supreme Court.'</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1907-02-02
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1974
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons given by Chief Justice Gummere in the opinion filed, in the Supreme Court and reported in 43 Vroom 336.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Beed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 11.
¶3For reversal — None.