Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 SO3D 944 - Ex Parte Stewart

Ex Parte Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc. · 775 So. 2d 153 - Ex Parte Inverness Construction Company · 601 So. 2d 907 - Piggly Wiggly No. 208, Inc. v. Dutton · Ex Parte McCormick · Ex Parte Sharp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and is appropriate when the petitioner can show (1) a clear legal right to the order sought; (2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4) the properly invoked jurisdiction of the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.