740 So. 2d 1066 - Marks v. Intergraph Corp., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Foremost Ins. Co. v. Parham · Bishop v. State · 530 So. 2d 217 - Ford v. Canton · Dorton v. Landmark Dental Care of Tuscaloosa, P.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As to [a] contention that the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence, ... we will not reverse an order denying a motion for a new trial on this ground unless, after allowing all reasonable presumptions of its correctness, we conclude that the preponderance of the evidence against the verdict is so decided as to clearly convince us that the verdict was wrong and unjust.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.