Hernandez v. Pritzker’s Empirical Analysis
741 F.3d 129 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms · Jones v. Bernanke · Bowden v. United States · Wiley v. Glassman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“produced sufficient evidence[-albeit minimal-]for a reasonable jury to find that the [District's] asserted non-retaliatory reason was not the actual reason”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“own statement claiming two colleagues told her about the openings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“counts for nothing in an opposition to summary judgment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.