Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

742 A.2d 1051

In re Roth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1998

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1998-02-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2002

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 1998, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 9, 1997, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that STEVEN JAY ROTH, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

/742/a2d/1051 · .json · Public domain