Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

742 So. 2d 348

Hoag v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-08-11

Relies on 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · Crompton v. State · Spivey v. State

Decided 1999-08-11

PER CURIAM.

¶1Cindy Hoffman Hoag appeals the summary denial of her request for jail credit, which the trial court treated as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because her motion failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Hoag’s ability to file a proper *349rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court which alleges that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief. See Spivey v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1681, 737 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

¶2Affirmed.

FULMER, A.C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

¶3i

/742/so2d/348 · .json · Public domain