Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 742 SW2D 371 - Soffar v. State

Soffar v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2004

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

100198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Williams v. State · Boutwell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the date, county, city, state, nation, street address or name of the bowling alley, the name of any victim, or any other fact which might expressly reflect that appellant's statement relates to the offense for which he was tried, convicted, and given the death sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “I aimed the gun and the other guy who was still left who was closest to the door and fired one time. I hit him in the back of the head behind the ear. I walked around the other side of them and heasitated [sic] and Lat said,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]mazingly, the State presented no direct testimony or evidence at [Soffar's] trial that would have accounted for Garner's absence at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.