Hamilton v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis
745 F.2d 1034 · 1984
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2013
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · 44 Tenn. App. 343 - Overstreet v. Norman · Hohensee v. Akron Beacon Journal Publishing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[djenial of [leave to amend] [was] not an abuse of discretion where”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The master, owes the duty of ordinary care to prevent injury to the servant in the work, and he is bound to use such care to furnish the servant a reasonably safe place and safe appliances for the work. This duty of the master is personal, continuous, and non-delegable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the duty to furnish an employee a reasonably safe place to work is the duty of the employer, and that duty is 'personal, continuous, and non-delegable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.