749 So. 2d 481 - Blankenship v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Armstrong v. State · 608 So. 2d 762 - Ex Parte State · 668 So. 2d 887 - Hairgrove v. State · 729 So. 2d 364 - James v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he mere statement in an order that the trial court considered the evidence presented by the state does not satisfy the due process requirements of Rule 27.6(f), Ala.R.Crim.P.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the evidence presented by the State at the defendant's probation revocation hearing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.