Franklin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Stevens · 522 So. 2d 963 - Ray v. State · 733 So. 2d 955 - Miller v. State · Harris v. State · M.C. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he fact that persons with criminal intent have not been given permission to enter has no effect on whether premises are open to the public. Otherwise, every time a person entered a structure that was open to the public with the intent to commit a crime, the person would have committed a burglarya result directly in conflict with the express language of section 810.02(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`Burglary' means entering or remaining in a dwelling, a structure, or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein, unless the premises are at the time open to the public or the defendant is licensed or invited to enter or remain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hether or not consent may have been withdrawn ... is not an issue. The only relevant question is whether the premises were open to the public at the time the defendant entered or remained with the intent to commit an offense therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.