Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

751 So. 2d 139

Docket No. 2D99-712.

Jones v. State

Demetrius JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-01-21

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2001

5 state decisions

Relies on 745 So. 2d 519 - Grant v. State · Pollock v. Couffer · Glave v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-01-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Joanna B. Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patricia E. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3*140 FULMER, Judge.

¶4Demetrius Jones appeals his sentence for felony battery arguing section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), the Prisoner Releasee Reoffender Act, is unconstitutional and the sentences imposed for that offense under both the Habitual Offender Statute and section 775.082(8) violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. In Grant v. State,745 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), this court recently considered and rejected the identical challenges to section 775.082(8). Accordingly, we affirm.

¶5We note, however, that the Fourth District has held that a sentence imposed for the same offense under both the Prisoner Releasee Reoffender Act and the Habitual Offender Statute violates the principle of double jeopardy. See Adams v. State,750 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Glave v. State,745 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Melton v. State,746 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Therefore, to the extent that our holding on the double jeopardy issue conflicts with the Fourth District's decision in these cases, we certify conflict.

¶6Affirmed.

¶7BLUE, A.C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.

/751/so2d/139 · .json · Public domain