Oukrop v. Wasserburger’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2004
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Smith v. Crouse · Fisher v. United States · Etchieson v. Texas · Smith v. Ford Motor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny requirement of adherence to a pretrial order entered in accordance with our Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure is a matter of discretion with the trial court. Claims of error in that regard are examined under an abuse of discretion standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we must recognize that rulings with respect to the admission of evidence are within the sound discretion of the trial court, and those rulings are entitled to considerable deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Law v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.