In re Hamer

Decided August 3, 2000

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2000-08-03

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 2002 Pa. Super. 142 - Ettinger v. Triangle-Pacific Corp. (2002), 2002 Pa. Super. 151 - Commonwealth v. Carmody (2002)

25 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-08-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on June 28, 2000, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Brenda Joyce Hamer to show cause why she should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

¶3ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Brenda Joyce Hamer is placed on temporary suspension and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.