State v. Lovell’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2017
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Tillman · Codianna v. Morris · United States v. Feldman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“testimony of an unavailable witness is presumed to be reliable when it clearly falls within an exception to the hearsay rule”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'a reasonable probability ... that except for ineffective counsel, the result would have been different.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Adams · State v. Kelley“`counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.