Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 759 F.2d 342 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

759 F.2d 342 · 1985

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2022 · most notably Adams v. Dole (1991), Jackson v. United States (1985)

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

18019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 649 · 18 U.S.C. § 654 · 18 U.S.C. § 655

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc. · United States v. Bramblett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he statutes compared in Fernando ... were not enacted pursuant to any integrated legislative plan. They were, for the most part, based upon a variety of predecessor statutes, and there is no reason to suppose Congress intended- them to comprise a consistent scheme for protecting the assets and revenues of the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.